eone nero, 05/12/2011 13.20:
Insider hai dato un'occhiata a quanto esposto nell'articolo da Tim Printy?
Cosa pensi a tal proposito?
Mi sembra un "investigatore", che si definisce egli stesso scettico sul fenomeno UFO, molto scrupoloso nella disamina dei maggiori eventi ufologici, quelli più significativi.
Qui infatti raccoglie l'intera indagine su Phoenix attraverso un indice:
THE WITNESSES:
home.comcast.net/~tprinty/UFO/azwit.htm
THE INVESTIGATORS:
home.comcast.net/~tprinty/UFO/azinv.htm
HOW ACCURATE WERE THE WITNESSES:
home.comcast.net/~tprinty/UFO/azacc.htm
THE MARYLAND NATIONAL GUARD AND THE FLARES:
home.comcast.net/~tprinty/UFO/azflares.htm
THE VIDEOTAPE EVIDENCE:
home.comcast.net/~tprinty/UFO/azvideo.htm
LUKE AFB INVOLVEMENT AND THE INTERCEPTIONS:
home.comcast.net/~tprinty/UFO/azluke.htm
MY CONCLUSIONS:
home.comcast.net/~tprinty/UFO/azconc.htm
Nelle sue conclusioni, ritengo interessante la dichiarazione riportata dell'astrofilo Stanley, in cui lamenta il "boicottaggio" ricevuto per aver spiegato l'origine del primo avvistamento con le luci di aerei in formazione:
Well I wasn't the most welcome person there but I don't feel I was treated badly. Well they all acted like it was just another story about what could have happened. All of those people had their own interpretation of what had happened. Yeah and they did try to discredit me a little when I was talking and I don't think anybody there wanted to believe my story, like I said they all had their own interpretations of what had happened and they were not going to change their mind.
Spero che gli altri leggano l'intera indagine, è ricchissima di informazioni.
[Modificato da _INSIDER_ 05/12/2011 16:24]