La signora Ellen, alla quale ho inviato l'analisi di Photobuster anche in "english version", non credo abbia molto gradito la spiegazione finale, contestado quelle che per lei sono anomalie: riflesso della luce nella parte alta del volatile e diversa grandezza della rondine rispetto alla prima più evidente...
A suo giudizio se la prima rondina vicina alla stalla si mostra in modo evidente, anche la seconda sarebbe dovuta apparire allo stesso modo perchè, sempre a suo giudizio, si presume volino alla stessa velocità...
La signora non esclude comunque che possa trattarsi di altro volatile, ma non di una rondine. Non pensa ad alieni ma crede molto nel paranormale...
E' evidente che la signora non ha tenuto conto di tutti gli altri fattori che determinano la differenza tra le sue sagome di volatili.
Posto comunque la sua replica in modo che possiate trarre alcune considerazioni che lasciano intendere che la signora Ellen crede molto nel nel paranormale...
Hi,
Their explanation lacks some logic here, it does not explain the light refraction coming off of the top, the size difference of the same bird, the fact that the smallest photo of the bird on the side of the barn is clear as a bell, yet the larger one is not??
Makes no sense the farther, bigger image is the same bird but blurred, for both birds are clearly moving, at the same time, but the smaller bird's image is clearer? Also, I have caught birds in my pics many times, and they are always identifiable, not blurred, you can make out their wings, beak, shape, and color when you zoom in. There is a swallow between the trees, below this larger "bird" on this photo, and a swallow flying between the barn and the tree on the shot after this photo....I did not have a cheap camera at the time, it was a Canon with the capability to capture fast moving objects, and take rapid photos with one click, with great clarity.
I can believe it to be a really fast moving bird, but definitely not a swallow....the fact they compared and analyzed it with the bird on the side of the barn makes me feel they are lacking depth perception skills, and therefore there findings would not be mathematically feasible.
I would have been more convinced if they said it was a diving eagle or chicken with a shiny cape on, something bigger than the little swallow at least.
Perhaps I did not send the before photo to show an object far away, but they would probably say it was a bug....none the less I don't feel it's an alien, I actually thought it could be something paranormal, for I have many pics of paranormal images, but this is the first I have caught something in the sky during the day.
Thanks for the review, and have a great day!